One of the most common questions I get on the topic of advanced male chastity is how desirable it is to have a chastity piercing, such as a Prince Albert, to ensure the safety of the device.
The thinking behind this is pretty straightforward: many of the safest, most serious, and therefore expensive chastity devices require the man to have a penis piercing in order for the chastity device to be properly locked in place.
Probably the most common combination is a Prince Albert piercing (where the safety pin enters the penis through a hole at the bottom of the head and exits through the urethra), but there are also devices that are compatible with frenulum and ampallang piercings.
So this raises a couple of questions.
FirstWhy would someone do this?
Well, the answer is simple: it makes devices much more secure.
Most chastity devices, even full belts, can escape a determined man, as long as he uses enough lubrication and can take a little pain.
There may be some devices for which this is not true, but I haven’t found one yet.
But a device secured with a piercing is a more secure chastity device than ever, simply because the penis is imprisoned with a metal pin that pierces the flesh.
And the design of the devices means that there is no way to remove the device without removing the pin first, unless you are willing to rip your flesh (very few men would want to do this, I’m sure).
And for men who are serious about long-term, permanent chastity, a secure device is part of the excitement.
There is something about being encased in a secure device that really turns men on. The feeling of not having control over their own orgasms is intoxicating for them.
Just keep in mind: no chastity device is and cannot be 100% safe, which means that no man is kept in a chastity device against his will.
There is no doubt that some devices are more secure than others, and many can only be removed or escaped from them with the help of tools.
But the tools needed are simple, and most men probably already have them in their garage. Plus, removing the device would be perfectly safe too, as long as he was careful.
Even a device that uses a piercing pin to keep the penis secure can be removed simply by cutting the pin (which could be done simply and safely with a pair of tin snips or wire cutters, for example).
Tea second The reason for the piercing is that for many men and women it is symbolic, and this symbolism is very powerful.
In a large proportion of relationships in which they practice male chastity, part of the dynamic is that the woman “owns” the man’s penis, or at least has all the “rights” that concern him.
In these cases, having the penis pierced, whether the man really wants to do it or not (taking into account that forever has the option actually, so it’s just part of the game) is a symbol of the exchange of power.
Of course, you don’t need to be pierced to enjoy chastity and you don’t even need a device.
The idea that you make is just another myth propagated by various people who have their own agendas for wanting you to accept their way of thinking.
My husband, John, had a piercing, but he never really settled into the device, so we removed the pieces and he currently wears a Lori # 2C, which is designed for men without piercings.
Currently he is in long-term orgasm denial and the reason he doesn’t escape is that he doesn’t. want for.
Male chastity is really about two people enjoying whatever dynamic they choose to implement and it’s just about educating themselves on safe, sane, and sensible practices.